Airsoft M&P Pistols - Tokyo Marui vs VFC | Tokyo
Information | History | View | Sightseeing | Video
Facebook - http://facebook.com/RemfTacticool Instagram - http://instagram.com/remf_tacticool Twitter - http://twitter.com/REMFTacticool Running over the handling characteristics, internal features, external appearances and shooting feel on the Tokyo Marui and VFC/Stark Arms M&P gas blowback pistols.
Comments
-
I have a kwc m&p 9 and compared to these I would say mine is better
-
@REMF Tacticool, does the tm springguide fits in the VFC? Mine is broken and cant find a cybergun/VFC on the internet. But tm is really common.
-
I only ever have problems with my left side slide release on my VFC. It never wants to work with a magazine in the gun. Anyone have any recommendations on how to remedy this?
-
No orange tips???
-
what is your recommend ? vfc or TM ?
-
I just got the VFC M&P, and while I don't have much airsoft experience yet and don't have the TM M&P to compare, I can compare it to my real-steel S&W M&P. In comparison to the NBB M&P from KWC, for example, the VFC feels a lot more like the S&W--remarkably so, I think, although even blindfolded I'd still never mistake one for the other. The VFC's grip is a bit wider where it meets the backstrap, making for some unevenness there, but overall I can hardly tell the difference just by feel, which is pretty neat. You commented that the VFC's backstrap material wasn't as nice as the TM's, but all I can tell you is that it feels virtually identical to the S&W's, which likewise doesn't feel very rubbery. If the TM's backstrap material feels rather different, then it may or may not be better but it is less realistic relative to the stock S&W.
Just from your video, I can tell that the VFC is slightly more realistic overall, although externally there are some differences in the details from the S&W. The VFC's slide appears more realistic, including the "dust cover" part which is accurate to the S&W M&P9's and M&P40's, while the TM's looks more like the M&P45's. Interestingly, it's not that readily obvious that the VFC's slide is metal, though, while in comparison the S&W's is obviously metal in every way--immediate to sight, touch, and feel (weight distribution). Even so, ultimately the VFC's metal slide and barrel are more realistic, so material selection does make a difference, but it's more subtle than I had expected, that's all. Additionally, being metal, the wear to the finish from use actually makes the VFC more realistic, even though I imagine it might look "ugly" to some.
You covered their advantages and disadvantages well. Get the VFC if you want something that looks and feels more like a real-steel S&W M&P (that is being shot as opposed to mounted for display), including the above as well as its trigger, which feels a lot more like the S&W's than I imagine the TM's does (based on your description and demonstration of the latter). The TM has a host of its own advantages, as you pointed out, so it depends on what the individual wants/prefers. I went for the VFC because it's closer to my primary defensive weapon for more realistic training (slightly), but of course there are other purposes for airsoft. -
Hi there, will the 2 magazines from vfc & tm compatible with each other, thanks!
-
The TM M&P VTAC has an upgraded trigger with a shorter reset. Not sure if it feels any better since it probably uses the same sear/hammer. Just the reset is shorter according to another video I found that explains the differences between the standard M&P and the VTAC. It appears TM modified the trigger bar slightly and altered the timing of the valve knocker block to allow a faster rate of fire.
-
UAC now makes an upgraded hammer/sear for the TM M&P along with new trigger bar and competition trigger. I wish TM would have used the G17 style hammer/sear in the M&P. Instead they installed the horrible XDM style sear. VFC installed the G17 style hammer/sear in their M&P. That's why the VFC trigger is so much nicer.
-
I missed where you got the barrel from the vfc. Can you post the link below please? And thank you!
-
My vfc mags fall right out when. U want to change em. Weird.
-
Wow I'm glad I got the vfc version. A plastic slide really TM.
-
Do the TM g17 and/or Hi-capa upgrades work in the M&P?
-
Awesome video mate... Was actually deciding if to either spend the extra money and go with the TM or the VFC. After watching your video i might just get the VFC anyway, i also own VFC's G19 and they rock.
Awesome detailed video got yourself a new sub, greetings from the Netherlands. -
tm p226 doesn't have a safety
-
Great review.
-
I always keep my boxes.
-
great video man, I was planning to buy the next M&P in dark earth with the vtak sights, looks so cool for me, I have 3 more TM pistols including the last HK45, so nice pistol by the way, but yes you are right the plastic slide tend to broke some internal parts if you shoot alot like on XDMs, by other side plastic is better for gas. the trigger as you shown looks much better on VFC. one thing I don´t understand is why TM did not make the same than on the HK45 with the slide blocker reinforced on this new M&P, this would make this slide stronger even if it is plastic. Thanks for this great video dude!! a hello from Spain.
-
Id choose the VFC for the build but the TM does shoot good, really well detailed video and amazing video quality.
-
Got a WE M&P myself (2 actually don't tell the wife!!) heard all the mixed reviews but only speaking for myself they've both been trouble free.sweet vid again fella