911 Perspective US Fire-Bombing Japan 1945 | Tokyo
Information | History | View | Sightseeing | Video
Bombing of defenceless civilian populations meets the definition of international war crimes and a crimes against humanity. Killing innocent civilians under the cloak of war is nothing but murder. U.S. firebombing campaign of Japan, which began in 1944, destroyed 50-90% of 67 Japanese cities killing an estimated 315,922 innocent Japanese, a greater number than the estimated deaths attributed to the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The firebombing of Tokyo alone resulted in roughly 100,000 Japanese killed. All this prior to dropping the first atomic bomb (uranium) on Hiroshima 6th August 1945, the explosion wiped out 90 percent of the city, then 3 days later dropped the more powerful plutonium A-bomb on Nagasaki, the physical destruction was even greater than in Hiroshima. Virtually nothing was left standing. Altogether, the two A-bombings killed an estimated 110,000 innocent Japanese citizens and injured another 130,000. By 1950, another 230,000 Japanese had died from injuries or radiation. ===================================== PEARL HARBOUR | PEARL HARBOUR | PEARL HARBOUR Word of the disaster reached Secretary Knox, who reported to Roosevelt. "No!" the President is supposed to have cried. The reaction would suggest that he was surprised. "Of course, he was surprised," said Jonathan Daniels much later. Daniels was the President's administrative assistant and press secretary. Then this trusted subordinate of Roosevelt made some revealing remarks: . . ."The blow was heavier than he had hoped it would necessarily be. . . . But the risks paid off; even the loss was worth the price. . . " Looking back over an extended history of the private thoughts of the President and his intimates, one encounters markers in the mentality that produced Pearl Harbor: "except in case of attack" "again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars." ". . . they (the Japanese) could not always avoid making mistakes, and that as the war continued and the area of operations expanded, sooner or later they would make a mistake and we would enter the war." ". . . there might be a possibility of war with Japan without the involvement of Germany . . . and it was determined that in such a case the United States would, if possible, initiate efforts to bring Germany into the war against us in order that we would be able to give strong support to the United Kingdom in Europe." ". . . the United States desires that Japan commit the first overt act" —inserted as "a direct instruction from the President." "The question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves." "Of course, no one anticipated that that overt act would be the crippling of the Pacific fleet." "The blow was heavier than he had hoped it would necessarily be. . . . But the risks paid off; even the loss was worth the price. . . ." MRS. ROOSEVELT: "December 7th was like any of the later D-Days to us. We clustered at the radio and waited for more details but it was far from the shock it proved to the country in general. We had expected something of the sort for a long time." SECRETARY OF LABOR PERKINS: ". . . in spite of the terrible blow to his pride, to his faith in the Navy and its ships, and to his confidence in the American Intelligence Service . . . [Mr. Roosevelt] had, nevertheless, a much calmer air. His terrible moral problem had been resolved in the event." SECRETARY OF WAR STIMSON: " We three [Hull, Knox, Stimson] all thought we must fight if the British fought. But now the Japs have solved the whole thing by attacking us directly in Hawaii. MRS. CHARLES HAMLIN, for many years a close friend of Mr.Roosevelt and a guest in the White House in November and December, 1941: The President, the night of his broadcast to the nation on the coming of war, "looked relieved, as if a load was off his mind at last, now that fate and the Japanese had finally settled everything that had been brewing for so long." POSTMASTER GENERAL FRANK WALKER: "I think the boss [Mr. Roosevelt] really feels more relief than he has had for a few weeks" MR. ROOSEVELT, the night of Pearl Harbor: "Well, we were attacked. There is no question about that." MR. ROOSEVELT, in a message on December 8 asking Congress to declare the existence of a state of war with the Japanese Empire: "Yesterday, December 7, 1941—a date which will live in infamy — the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan. . . . Always feels more relief than he has had for weeks." MR. ROOSEVELT, in a radio message to the nation on the night of will we remember the character of the onslaught against us." December 9: "We are all in it—all the way."
Comments
-
Crazy to think that was 1945 and the U.S is still to this day acting out there bs to kill inoncent people and trying to justify it with the same outrageous lies and total bull crap.
-
Keep up the good work fine fine american video with great wondrous free speech
-
If you have moral in the war, you will lost and every one that died will died for nothing
-
macnamra is a pile of shit , how about his stupid decisions in vietnam that caused american deaths . gen LA MAY could have won the vietnam war in one year if he was unleashed .
-
up we go into the wild blue yonder flying high into the sun
-
I'm looking for the documentary used in this clip. Its a nat-geo doc. But can't find title. Wats the title?? And who's the man speaking?
-
Did they feel any guilt when they bombed Darwin? Did they feel any guilt when they made my father suffer in Changi for three years? Did they regret attacking Pearl Harbour - In the end I certainly think so! Those swine got everything they deserved! It wish it could have been worse for them! What are you people talking about - this was a nation of absolute animal morons!!
-
>Bombing of defenceless civilian populations meets the definition of international war crimes and a crimes against humanity. Killing innocent civilians under the cloak of war is nothing but murder.
Wrong, targeting civilian populations from the air was not a war crime in WWII, whether the purpose was to kill them or not. The U.S. Air Force attacked enemy civilians who were part of the war effort. If enemy civilians were killed, then factories could not function in producing munitions. Yes it was cruel but it was the only way to cripple the enemy's ability to wage war.
No side were prosecuted for dropping bombs on civilians in WWII. German airmen who firebombed Warsaw, Rotterdam, London, and Coventry were not tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity, British airmen who firebombed Berlin, Cologne, Hamburg, and Dresden were not tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity, American airmen who firebombed Tokyo and Osaka and dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity, and Japanese airmen who bombed Pearl Harbor, Shanghai, Chongqing, and other civilian cities in Asia were not tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity either.
"The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, which address the codes of wartime conduct on land and at sea, were adopted before the rise of air power. Despite repeated diplomatic attempts to update international humanitarian law to include aerial warfare, it was not updated before the outbreak of World War II. The absence of specific international humanitarian law did not mean aerial warfare was not covered under the laws of war, but rather that there was no general agreement of how to interpret those laws. This means that aerial bombardment of civilian areas in enemy territory by all major belligerents during World War II was not prohibited by positive or specific customary international humanitarian law."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_bombing_during_World_War_II
Please change the fucking description, you Japanese apologist. -
The Firebombing campaign was NOT justified, At all
-
Once the US had taken landing strips in range of mainland Japan they had two options. They could send troops to the mainland, which every estimate said would cost massive US troop loses (400-800K), or they could use their established air superiority to submit Japan with essentially no human cost on the American side. The real mistake was Japan's refusal to surrender in the face of obvious defeat. The racist regime was the Japanese who were brutal towards all non-japanese in the pacific region.
-
We wernt there. Not all felt Revenge but as a Nation we did as a Whole.
-
AMERICONNED JACK ". .the United States desires that Japan commit the first overt act" —inserted as "a direct instruction from the President." "The question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot without allowing too much danger to ourselves." "Of course, no one anticipated that that overt act would be the crippling of the Pacific fleet. The blow was heavier than he had hoped it would necessarily be. But the risks paid off; even the loss was worth the price"
-
I'm sorry did you say "PROUD TO BE AMERICAN" or proud to be a an absolute idiot? sorry, can't tell.
-
We don't need a Hateful Nation with all there citizen that workship & dead for a single human being as Living God in the name of Religion that make a major part of their every day life style
-
A nation with it citizen and childrens that worship a funny looking retarded shits as a Living GOD with their hate crimes against all human beings outside of the Nip and Pon Pon nation for more than 50 years. brainwashed to Rape and killed the Mother of the Korean Nation, and Okinawan kingdom.. plus forced European solders to watch the raping of European Women in Hongkong/Philipines/Singapore/Java /Vietnam also millions & millions of Woman was raped and killed in China..& Asia .
-
Your government fucks up. Your whole family gets burned to death, and people thing you deserves it. Faith in humanity -1.
-
2 Wrong makes a right. Thats how things should be.
-
SEPPO'S WHO THUNK JAPANESE CIVILIANS GOT WHAT THEY DESERVED? Would have to accept the same fate if, for example: LAOS BOMBED THE U.S EVERY 8 MINUTES, 24/7 FOR 10 YEARS STRAIGHT? No, they wouldn't accept it, they'd argue that innocent civilians shouldn’t pay with their lives for what the US Military did. Seppo's with Thinking Disabilities who post narrow minded racist views should leave commenting for those who have a mind and know it, those who haven't and don't should stop pretending!
-
This holocaust in Tokyo is: •Not studied in special curricula in American schools • Not memorialized by American museums or exhibits •No reparations have been paid and no apologies issued by the perpetrators. • Based on the rationale of "victor's justice," the perpetrators were not prosecuted for war crimes and mass murder. Why is one holocaust worth more than another? -Michael Hoffman
-
That is very easy to answer. It was decided by our government that no more American lives wouls be lost if it could be prevented, therefore the firebombing was conducted. The Emporor of Japan (Hirohito) refused surrender out of his own pride. Then came the Atom bombs. When the first Atom bomb was dropped it should have ended the war but still Hirohito refused. A second was dropped and finnaly he surrendered. For the record, a very threatining warning was given to before the A bombs were used